Wednesday, September 4, 2019
We Must Have the Right to Choose Euthanasia :: Free Euthanasia Essay
      We Must Have the Right to Choose Euthanasia                   There are many sides to the  dilemma of whether or not euthanasia     should be carried out.  There is the question of morality, the question  of     active versus passive euthanasia and the question of when euthanasia  should     be put into use.  None of these questions are totally cut and dry.   There     seem to be more gray areas within this issue than there are black and  white.            Yet when you look at the problem on a personal level with the  actual     individuals involved, some of those gray areas almost disappear.   People     are put on this earth to live.  When it gets to the point where the  quality     of a person's life gets so bad that they can no longer function in the     world, there is no reason to force that person to stay alive.   Euthanasia     is therefore a  necessary evil for those whose practical life is in  effect     over due to a terminal illness or otherwise life devastating condition.                   If a person is in unbearable pain  and close to death or is in a     vegetable state and no longer able to function, their life is by all     practical means over.  There is no reason to keep them alive.  The  only way     to end their physical life is by euthanasia.  The question is whether to  do     this by way of active euthanasia or passive euthanasia.  Many are  against     active euthanasia because in this case you actually kill the person  rather     than letting them die.  But both methods are used for the same end which  is     to end someone's life without further pain for the patient as well as for     the family.  The only choice to make after this fact is established  is     which of these means better carries out the end. James Rachels, a     philosophy professor, says that, "if one simply withholds treatment [in  the     way of passive euthanasia], it may take the patient longer to die, and so     he may suffer more than he would if more direct action were taken and a     lethal injection given." (Rachels, p.111)  This defeats the purpose  of     euthanasia which is to end suffering.  Therefore, in cases where  euthanasia     is going to be carried out, active euthanasia is the better choice.  					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.